Employment Law – How to avoid being a sex pest

March 1st, 2013 — 10:12pm

An irreverent guide to office relations…

The Independent: Friday 01 March 2013
Office relations guide: how to avoid being a sex pest
It’s not just the Lib Dems who are under fire over harassment claims. Organisations everywhere are struggling to respond correctly to issues arising from their employees’ sexual urges. Ellen E Jones spells out what is and isn’t acceptable in the modern workplace

It seems every workplace in the land is being rocked by a sexual harassment scandal. And if even national leaders and heads of giant corporations are so flummoxed by the line between bad office etiquette, behaviour that requires disciplinary proceedings and criminal sexual harassment, what hope is there for the average office dinosaur? Here, by way of clarification, are 10 common scenarios and suggestions on how to navigate them with your dignity (almost) intact.

Scenario 1: “I am a single man and fancy one of my colleagues, who is younger than and junior to me. Is there an ‘appropriate’ way I can take our friendship to a sexual level?”

Not really, no. Sorry. Let’s imagine, for argument’s sake, that your wit always translates perfectly on the intra-office email and the harsh office lighting sets off your silver fox mane a treat; you are the George Clooneyest mofo ever to wield a Ryman’s stapler. Your younger, junior colleague definitely fancies you, but sadly that’s not really the issue here. As Sarah Culshaw, a partner in the employment team at Collyer Bristow Solicitors, can attest, it’s not how you get into it that matters, it’s how you get out. “I’ve had several cases where I’ve been acting for individuals where it’s gone wrong and the junior person is then complaining and there’s enough evidence that makes it look as though it was part of a harassment scenario.” In short: it’s not illegal. But it’s not a good idea, either.

Scenario 2: “I keep hearing general gossip that one of my employees likes to grope junior staff but no one has come forward with hard evidence. My instinct is to ask him quietly to leave. Is this wrong?”

Contrary to the apparent confusion over at Lib Dem HQ, there are clear guidelines to follow. First off, you can forget about having a quiet word. This would be grounds for an unfair dismissal claim. Steve Williams, head of equality at the government-funded Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas), says a formal investigation followed by a proper disciplinary process is called for, even in the case of “gossip”. That might sound unduly heavy-handed, but it protects Gropey McGroperson too. “Even if these rumours are not true you need to find out why they are circulating and whether there is something about this person’s management style that is leading to them.” Got that, Mr Clegg?

Scenario 3: I run a small business and treat my employees like a family. I occasionally refer to the young ladies who work for me as “sweetheart” or “love”. A new employee recently asked if I would use her Christian name instead. Is she overreacting? Or am I out of date?

Look at it like this, treacle: you obviously aim to create a friendly working environment, which is nice, so your new employee has done you a favour by revealing that your nicknames may not always be as well received as they are intended. Perhaps your other female employees enjoy your avuncular manner – or perhaps they’d also prefer to communicate as one adult to another. Either way, you now have the perfect opportunity to raise the issue and find out for sure. As for the individual employee in question, Jeff Havens, author of The Super Awesome Book of Office Etiquette, has a suggestion: “Since I’m guessing that you wouldn’t be OK with her calling you ‘grandpa’ or ‘village elder’, you should respect the fact that she would prefer to be called by her name.”

Scenario 4: A junior colleague has put on weight and started wearing baggy clothing. I suspect she is trying to hide a pregnancy and would like to avoid major disruption by beginning preparations for her maternity leave as soon as possible. Is it OK to just ask?

This is one of those situations where a manager, powerful and beneficent as he no doubt is, must regrettably accept the limits of his purview. To wit: other people’s wombs. “Even if you suspect it, you shouldn’t say ‘Are you pregnant?’ or even ask other people if she is, because that might result in some sort of sex discrimination claim,” says Culshaw. In other words, you could ask her if she’s pregnant, but a simple enquiry after the pies, and who ate them all, would probably achieve the same effect and be less legally complicated.*

Remember also that the law incentivises women to give you fair notice, anyway. “Basically, if she’s going to get her benefits, she’s obliged to notify you 15 weeks before the due date.”

Scenario 5: A female colleague has always behaved towards me in a flirtatious manner. It never really bothered me, but following a recent promotion I’m now her line manager and I’m worried it’s become inappropriate. How can I cool things off?

Steve Williams of Acas confirms that your instincts are correct: “It would be unfair on your female colleague and other members of the team if they thought that she was somehow your favourite as a result of any flirtation.” But how to pull off this delicate transition without causing undue embarrassment? Don’t single her out for a tête-à-tête – that could easily be misinterpreted. Instead, call a meeting to remind all your new juniors that your promotion means the tone of your interactions with them will change. True, you’ll come off like an officious, stuck-in-the-mud, Billy no-mates – but that’s why they pay you the big bucks. Welcome to management!

Scenario 6: “I recently complimented a female colleague on a dress she was wearing. She looked offended and has avoided me since. Did I do something wrong?”

That all depends on the nature of the compliment, doesn’t it? In the interests of clarity, non-safe topics include hair, shoes and cleavages. Safe topics include, work and… that’s it. Delivery also matters, as Jeff Havens points out. “Were you speaking from a respectable distance, or did you surprise her by appearing suddenly over her shoulder and whispering into her ear?” The easiest solution is an apology, and if in future you decide to limit yourself to admiring the inventiveness of her Excel formulae, no one would blame you. She will probably be just as flattered and you’ll both be spared the lingering sense of unease.

Scenario 7: I had a bit too much to drink at the work party last night and made a sexual advance. Nothing came of it, but the atmosphere between us has been awkward. I have reason to believe she’s gossiped about it to other colleagues. How can I restore my reputation and clear the air?

Sorry to break this to you in the midst what is no doubt a truly evil hangover, but this is potentially a bit more serious than you might think. If this individual goes on to make a complaint about you, you may well face disciplinary proceedings. “I think in that situation, I would approach her informally and apologise, hope that the gossip would go away, but consider reporting it to the line manager or HR anyway,” advises Culshaw. If your suspicions of gossiping are correct, it’s unlikely you’ll be telling them anything they don’t already know, but this way you’ll have the opportunity to get your side across. “If the person he made an advance to is more junior, it’s more important to report it. If there’s an imbalance of any sort, it’s more likely to cause problems.”

Scenario 8: I have a colleague at work who is also a trusted friend. He has a habit of loudly discussing sexual matters and the physical attributes of various celebrities, and although I find it amusing, I’m worried he’s making our female colleagues uncomfortable. Should I ask him to stop?

Absolutely, and not just because he sounds like a real bore. “The test in such a case is subjectively whether the claimant finds it offensive,” warns Culshaw. “When it actually comes to it, will people actually go ahead with a claim? Probably not. But very often it’s part of another pattern of behaviour.” Sympathetic interpretation: your mate, a generally-all-round-decent-jolly-good bloke with a bawdy sense of humour, is leaving himself open to attack by any litigious employee with a grudge. Hostile interpretation: your friend’s behaviour is a symptom of a toxic workplace environment which you’d be wise to distance yourself from, and sharpish.

Scenario 9: I’m in a senior managerial position at a large company. At a recent awards dinner, large quantities of wine were drunk and a younger, junior colleague became very drunk (as did I) and very amorous. One thing led to another and we ended up in bed together. Does this make me a sex pest?

Not necessarily, but you are a silly, silly man. It’s not that the disparity in your age and status makes you a sex pest, it’s that by clouding the issue with a hundred different potential motivations, it will make it difficult for you to prove that you are not a sex pest, should it ever get out (and it probably will – see scenario 1). Whatever you do, don’t be tempted to take her aside for a Monday morning debrief. “If you go and say ‘Don’t say a word to anyone’ then that could look like you’re putting more pressure on,” says Culshaw.

Scenario 10: I’ve just seen a colleague who’s been away on maternity leave. I wanted to ask her “When are you planning to come back?” But I have a vague sense that, as I’m in a managerial position and she’s not, this might be considered inappropriate – so I didn’t. Now I feel that, by not asking such an obvious question, I’ve been unnecessarily unfriendly. Was I being unduly paranoid?

You were right to tread carefully, as the law does protect women on maternity leave from being pressured back into work. But you could have acquitted yourself with more finesse. Next time, a simple, “How’s the new baby?” should suffice as small talk. Or if you really want to know when she’s coming back and are feeling brave, you could venture something like: “The office has fallen apart without you, we’re looking forward to having you back…” followed by an awkward pause. She may or may not choose to fill this pause with details of her return date.

Comments Off | ... Employment, 08 LAW

How to Privatise Education by Stealth

February 14th, 2013 — 3:51am

Education is a problem. It is expensive. It would be much better to have the costs off the books. Even if it costs more [there are economies of scale to be had with semi-centralisation]. Even if the most vulnerable fall through the chasm created [read on]. However, you can just privatise an institution like education. The public won’t have it. It must be done slowly, quietly, dishonesty. A few easy steps below.

CREATE A PARALLEL SYSTEM FOR VESTED INTERESTS
Give control to: private companies, parents, charities, teachers and even religious fundamentalists. Allow them to set their own courses [Although, core subject in the National Curriculum in must be studied and academies are subject to inspection by Ofsted]. Remove local government control [at odds with good governance principle of subsidiarisation which provides the lowest competent authority makes the decisions that affects its community]. Apply a business model to: “create more local competition and drive-up standards”. Have schools directly funded by central government [for now]. Have shortfalls in funds made up by personal or corporate “sponsors” [Staff now to fund-raise rather than educate].

IGNORE FUNDAMENTAL FLAWS

SUNDAY 17 MARCH 2013
‘Not good’: Ofsted gives a mixed verdict on education reforms
Substantial improvements needed in three of the first seven free schools to be inspected, yet Government is pushing ahead with hundreds more

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/not-good-ofsted-gives-a-mixed-verdict-on-education-reforms-8537667.html

Wednesday 09 January 2013
Academy schools ‘flout admissions rules to select privileged pupils’
The report, by the Academies Commission, says that it has received “numerous submissions” stating that academies are finding methods to “select covertly” and warns this could lead to increased social segregation. These include arranging “social” events for prospective parents to get round a ban on direct interviews with parents set out in the Government’s admissions code. Another method is to seek further information “not permitted by the code” before deciding on admissions.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/academy-schools-flout-admissions-rules-to-select-privileged-pupils-8444957.html

Tuesday 17 July 2012
Creationist groups win Michael Gove’s approval to open free schools
Grindon Hall Christian school in Sunderland, a private school due to reopen in September with state funding, says on its website that it will present creationism as science and affirm the position that Christians believe God’s creation of the world is “not just a theory but a fact”.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/jul/17/creationist-groups-approval-free-schools

Wednesday 20 February 2013
A C Grayling: Creationist free schools are an abuse – ancient ignorance has no place in education
Freedom of Information figures reported in The Independent this week show that 132 of the 517 applications to open free schools in the past couple of years have come from faith groups. Creationists and fundamentalists of various stamps are eager to open schools so that they can proselytise the young, knowing that this is by far the chief way that religious belief survives in the world.

Monday 3 September 2012
Free school programme fails to tackle shortage of primary places, says Labour
Shadow education secretary, Stephen Twigg, said new schools were often being set up in areas where there was a surplus of places bit not in those where there was a shortage.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/sep/03/free-school-primary-places-labour

DISCREDIT OR IGNORE THE OPPOSITION

TUESDAY 02 APRIL 2013
National Union of Teachers gives unanimous vote of no confidence in Education Secretary Michael Gove
Motion is first time in NUT’s 143-year history union has taken such a step over Education Secretary
Research had shown only eight per cent of parents thought the Coalition Government had had a positive impact on education.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/national-union-of-teachers-gives-unanimous-vote-of-no-confidence-in-education-secretary-michael-gove-8557042.html

31 January 2012
Michael Gove labels academy opponents ‘Trots’
But when Mr Gove was asked about a campaign against turning Downhills Primary School in north London into an academy, he accused the protesters of being linked to the Socialist Workers Party – and described them as the “enemies of promise”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-16809400

4 January 2012
Michael Gove: Academy school critics ‘happy with failure’

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-16409940

Friday 15 February 2013
‘Dump f***ing everyone’: the inside story of how Michael Gove’s vicious attack dogs are terrorising the DfE
Gove promised the Treasury he would “do more with less”, would halve the £580m annual running cost of the DfE by 2016… internal complaints lodged by staff on the receiving end of what many regard as an “us-and-them aggressive, intimidating culture”, Gove’s policy reform masks a hard-line ideological revolution.

Were MPs misled? Embarrassed Gove pleads innocence as he is recalled to committee over ‘bullying case’
Education Secretary denied knowledge of claim that cost the DfE £25,000 in an out-of-court settlement
The case was brought by woman with 27 years experience in Whitehall. She claimed bullying and intimidation were part of the day-to-day operation of the DfE’s communications division headed by a former Gove aide, James Frayne.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/were-mps-misled-embarrassed-gove-pleads-innocence-as-he-is-recalled-to-committee-over-bullying-case-8513325.html

DESTROY OR CONVERT THE COMPETITION

Wednesday 14 November 2012
Exclusive: Thriving schools to close to make room for academies
Anger at ‘unforeseen consequence’ of Gove’s education revolution

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/exclusive-thriving-schools-to-close-to-make-room-for-academies-8313131.html

Wednesday 13 February 2013
Exclusive: Cash for academies: Michael Gove ‘bribes’ schools to change their status
Claims taxpayers’ money is being spent on ‘buying off’ critics of the Education Secretary’s pet project

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/exclusive-cash-for-academies-michael-gove-bribes-schools-to-change-their-status-8492386.html

PRIVATISE THE NEW SYSTEM

Wednesday 09 January 2013
Exclusive: Revealed – Tory plan for firms to run schools for profit
Private companies would be able to run state schools for profit under a plan to be published by Conservative modernisers which could be introduced if the party wins the next general election

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/exclusive-revealed–tory-plan-for-firms-to-run-schools-for-profit-8445066.html

Sunday 10 February 2013
Secret memo shows Michael Gove’s plan for privatisation of academies
Mr Gove’s officials are considering “reclassifying academies to the private sector” to cut government costs. All academies and free schools in England, which are the Education Secretary’s personal obsession, would be free to become profit-making for the first time, and be entirely decoupled from Whitehall control.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/secret-memo-shows-michael-goves-plan-for-privatisation-of-academies-8488552.html

Comments Off | ACTIVISM LINKS

UK Banks: Illegal, Unlawful, Sharp Practices & a lack of due diligence

November 2nd, 2012 — 8:38am

A few links to chew on. A commentary to follow.

FRIDAY 05 APRIL 2013
Worse than Fred Goodwin! The verdict on the bank bosses who presided over the £40bn collapse of HBOS
Banking standards commission report dismisses ‘hollow’ apologies by HBOS management that staggering losses were due to unpredictable events of credit crunch, citing a ‘colossal failure’ of strategy by the board

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/worse-than-fred-goodwin-the-verdict-on-the-bank-bosses-who-presided-over-the-40bn-collapse-of-hbos-8560952.html

7:20am UK, Friday 15 March 2013
JP Morgan Slammed In ‘London Whale’ Report
A US Senate report has slammed investment bank JP Morgan over the conduct of its so-called London Whale trader, who lost the company more than $6bn. The official report said JP Morgan Chase & Co ignored risks, misled investors, fought with regulators and tried to work around rules as it dealt with mushrooming losses in a derivatives portfolio.

Tuesday 19 February 2013
Pressure mounts on Lloyds boss as bank is fined £4.3m over delayed payment protection insurance redress

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/pressure-mounts-on-lloyds-boss-as-bank-is-fined-43m-over-delayed-payment-protection-insurance-redress-8500752.html

Friday 08 February 2013
RBS fined £390m / $612m for rigging Libor interest rate
he charges brought against RBS relate to: Successful manipulation, attempted manipulation, and false reporting relating to LIBOR for Yen and Swiss Franc. They cover the period between mid-2006 and 2010. That means the practice continued after it was partially nationalised.

Friday 01 February 2013
Barclays faces further blow to reputation amid warning bank could face criminal charges over 2008 bailout
…it is alleged that Barclays lent money to Qatar so that it could invest it in Barclays. This is a serious offence under the 2006 Companies Act and could result in criminal charges if the allegations turn out to be true.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/barclays-faces-further-blow-to-reputation-amid-warning-bank-could-face-criminal-charges-over-2008-bailout-8477850.html

Thursday 31 January 2013
Another rip off by the big four? Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and RBS ‘broke rules’ with sales of interest rate hedges to small businesses
The Financial Services Authority said in a review of 173 cases it found the banks had broken at least one of its rules in more than 90 per cent of the sales.
xperts believe as many as 40,000 small businesses were sold the complicated interest rate swaps which were meant to protect firms against sharp rises in interest rates but left them nursing large losses when rates fell from the end of 2008. Total compensation could reach £1.5bn.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/another-rip-off-by-the-big-four-barclays-hsbc-lloyds-and-rbs-broke-rules-with-sales-of-interest-rate-hedges-to-small-businesses-8475412.html

07 January 2013
Bank of America to pay $11.6 bn in Fannie Mae deal
Bank of America said Monday it would pay $11.6 billion to settle agency mortgage repurchase claims on soured loans sold to mortgage finance giant Fannie Mae.

http://www.france24.com/en/20130107-bank-america-pay-116-bn-fannie-mae-deal

Thursday 03 January 2013
Switzerland’s oldest bank admits helping rich Americans hide over $1bn (£738m) from US tax authorities

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/switzerlands-oldest-bank-admits-helping-rich-americans-hide-over-1bn-738m-from-us-tax-authorities-8437462.html

Wednesday 19 December 2012
UBS admits fraud in £940m Libor rigging settlement
The FSA said the misconduct was “extensive and widespread” as UBS’s traders routinely made requests to colleagues responsible for determining Libor and Euribor submissions in an effort to benefit their own trading positions. It said that at least 45 individuals including traders, managers and senior managers were involved in, or aware of, the practice. The regulator recorded at least 2,000 requests for inappropriate submissions and said many more would have been made orally.

10 December 2012
Standard Chartered hit by $300m in Iran fines
Standard Chartered will pay more than $300m (£187m) to settle charges it violated US sanctions on Iran, Burma, Libya and Sudan.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20669650

Swiss banking giant UBS fined £29.7m over rogue trader Kweku Adoboli
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) said procedures, management systems and internal controls at the bank’s London branch were “seriously defective”.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/swiss-banking-giant-ubs-fined-297m-over-rogue-trader-kweku-adoboli-8351624.html

HSBC admits laundering money for drug cartels, terrorists and rogue states – video
HSBC executives admit to US senators that staff at its global subsidiaries laundered billions of dollars for drug cartels, terrorists and pariah states. David Bagley, HSBC’s head of compliance since 2002, resigns in front of the permanent subcommittee of investigations, which subjected Europe’s biggest bank to a humiliating interrogation over the scandal

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/video/2012/jul/18/hsbc-laundering-drug-terrorists-video

HSBC investigation: Drug dealers, gun runners and Britain’s biggest bank
Britain’s biggest bank is at the centre of a major HM Revenue and Customs investigation after it opened offshore accounts in Jersey for serious criminals living in this country, The Telegraph can disclose.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/offshorefinance/9665741/HSBC-investigation-Drug-dealers-gun-runners-and-Britains-biggest-bank.html

RBS traders boasted of Libor ‘cartel’
Senior traders at Royal Bank of Scotland boasted about operating a “cartel” that made “amazing” amounts of money by rigging interest rates, it has been disclosed.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9568087/RBS-traders-boasted-of-Libor-cartel.html

Barclays faces record £290m penalty
British bank suffers another hit to its battered reputation as it confronts huge costs for alleged US energy market manipulation

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/nov/01/barclay-banking

PPI bill likely to be largest in modern history
Analysts say that the total compensation bill for customers allegedly mis-sold payment protection insurance is likely to be the largest in modern history – bigger than the pension mis-selling scandal. We take a look at how the bill has climbed in recent years. British banks have so far set aside £11.5bn to compensate customers allegedly mis-sold PPI.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9647966/PPI-bill-likely-to-be-largest-in-modern-history.html

Barclays shamed by £290m fine for market fixing
Bob Diamond to forgo bonus after finding of interest rate conspiracy
Investigators from the US and the UK discovered that Barclays traders routinely manipulated one of the world’s most important interest rates, affecting everything from mortgage rates to the value of complex financial derivatives, all in the hope of increasing their trading profits and their own yearly bonuses. At one point, Barclays was lying “on an almost daily basis” in the information it published to the market, according to a US regulator.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/barclays-shamed-by-290m-fine-for-market-fixing-7893782.html

Cable: The City is a massive cesspit
Business Secretary and Mervyn King savage culture at scandal-hit banks

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/cable-the-city-is-a-massive-cesspit-7900034.html

King blasts bankers over pay, service – and morality
Governor of the Bank of England joins Business Secretary with attack on the City as rate-fixing scandal grows
The Governor of the Bank of England yesterday launched a stinging attack on the culture of the industry he oversees, condemning bankers for high pay, immoral practices and providing shoddy service to customers. Sir Mervyn King stopped short of calling for a Leveson-style inquiry into past practices at Britain’s banks but said there needed to be a “real change in culture” as a consequence of successive scandals. “From excessive levels of compensation, to shoddy treatment of customers, to a deceitful manipulation of one of the most important interest rates and now news of yet another mis-selling scandal, we can see we need a real change in the culture of the industry,” he said.He added that hard-working bank staff had been “let down” and that banks now needed “leadership of an unusually high order”.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/king-blasts-bankers-over-pay-service–and-morality-7900039.html

FSA finds banks guilty of mis-selling to small firms
The Financial Services Authority says banks mis-sold specialist insurance, known as interest rate swaps, to thousands of small businesses.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18640101

Comments Off | ACTIVISM LINKS

Compensation for Delays – Travel Law

October 23rd, 2012 — 10:14pm

600€ big ones for delays of more than three-hours. This might make airlines think twice before they show contempt for passengers and cancel half-empty flights for commercial reasons with the result that the affected passengers are crammed in to later planes.

Passengers on delayed flights should get compensation, EU court confirms
European court upholds ruling that passengers are entitled to compensation for late flights as well as cancellations. The EU’s court of justice ruled that passengers whose flights arrive more than three hours late are entitled to compensation of up to €600 (£488) each unless the delay is due to extraordinary circumstances outside the airline’s control, such as strikes or bad weather.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/23/passengers-delayed-flights-compensation-eu

Flight delay compensation payable, says EU Court of Justice
Passengers will be able to claim compensation of between 250 euros ($324; £204) and 600 euros, depending on the flight distance

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20050213

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Court of Justice of the European Union
PRESS RELEASE No 135/12
Luxembourg, 23 October 2012
Press and Information
Judgment in Joined Cases C-581/10
Nelson and Others v Deutsche Lufthansa AG and C-629/10 TUI Travel and Others v Civil Aviation Authority

The Court of Justice has confirmed its previous ruling that passengers whose flights have been delayed for a long time may be compensated. Where passengers reach their final destination three hours or more after the scheduled arrival time, they may claim fixed compensation from the airline, unless the delay is caused by extraordinary circumstances. EU law [1] provides that, if their flights are cancelled, passengers may receive fixed compensation amounting to between €250 and €600. In the judgment in Sturgeon and Others [2], the Court of Justice found that passengers whose flights are delayed may be treated the same way as those whose flights are cancelled as regards their right to compensation. Thus, the Court held that if passengers reach their final destination three hours or more after the arrival time originally scheduled, they may claim fixed compensation from the airline, unless the delay is caused by extraordinary circumstances.

The Amtsgericht Köln (Local Court, Cologne) and the High Court of Justice (England and Wales) seek clarification concerning the scope of the judgment in Sturgeon and Others. In the first case (C-581/10), the German Court is hearing a dispute between passengers and the airline Lufthansa concerning the delay to the passengers’ flight of more than 24 hours in relation to the original schedule. In the second case (C-629/10), TUI Travel, British Airways, easyJet Airline and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) have brought proceedings before the United Kingdom Courts following the Civil Aviation Authority’s refusal of their request not to impose on them an obligation to compensate passengers whose flights are delayed. That independent regulator, responsible for enforcing aviation regulation in the United Kingdom, had stated that it was bound to give effect to the ruling in Sturgeon and Others.
By its judgment today, the Court confirms its interpretation of EU law in the judgment in Sturgeon and Others. It reiterates that the principle of equal treatment requires that passengers whose flights are delayed and those whose flights are cancelled ‘at the very last moment’ must be regarded as being in comparable situations as regards the application of their right to compensation, because those passengers suffer similar inconvenience, namely, a loss of time. Since passengers whose flights are cancelled are entitled to compensation where their loss of time is equal to or in excess of three hours, the Court finds that passengers whose flights are delayed may also rely on that right where, on account of a delay to their flight, they suffer the same loss of time, that is, where they reach their final destination three hours or more after the arrival time originally scheduled by the air carrier. Nevertheless, in adopting Regulation No 261/2004, the EU legislature was seeking to strike a balance between the interests of air passengers and those of air carriers. Accordingly, such a delay does not entitle passengers to compensation if the air carrier can prove that the long delay is caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if

[1] Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

[2] Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon and Others [2009] I-10923.

See also Press Release No 102/09.

www.curia.europa.eu
All reasonable measures had been taken, namely circumstances beyond the actual control of the air carrier.
The Court also finds that the requirement to compensate passengers whose flights are delayed is compatible with the Montreal Convention [3]. In that connection, the Court finds that the loss of time inherent in a flight delay constitutes an inconvenience which is not governed by the Montreal Convention. Consequently, the obligation to compensate passengers whose flights are delayed falls outside the scope of that convention, but remains additional to the system for damages laid down by it. Next, the Court holds that that obligation is also compatible with the principle of legal certainty according to which passengers and air carriers must know precisely the respective scope of their rights and obligations. In addition, the Court makes clear that the requirement to compensate passengers whose flights are delayed is consistent with the principle of proportionality, according to which measures adopted by EU institutions must not exceed the limits of what is appropriate and necessary in order to attain the legitimate objectives pursued by the legislation in question, and the disadvantages caused must not be disproportionate to the aims pursued. In that connection, the Court notes that the obligation to pay compensation does not concern every delay, but only long delays. Moreover, airlines are not obliged to pay compensation if they can prove that the cancellation or long delay is caused by extraordinary circumstances. Lastly, the Court considered the requests from the airlines concerned to limit the temporal effect of its ruling. Those airlines submit that EU law cannot be relied upon as the basis for claims by passengers for compensation in respect of flights which have been the subject of delay prior to the date of delivery of the present judgment, except as regards passengers who had already brought court proceedings for such compensation as of the date of the judgment. In that regard, the Court answers that there is no need to limit the temporal effects of the present judgment.

NOTE: A reference for a preliminary ruling allows the courts and tribunals of the Member States, in disputes which have been brought before them, to refer questions to the Court of Justice about the interpretation of European Union law or the validity of a European Union act. The Court of Justice does not decide the dispute itself. It is for the national court or tribunal to dispose of the case in accordance with the Court’s decision, which is similarly binding on other national courts or tribunals before which a similar issue is raised.
Unofficial document for media use, not binding on the Court of Justice.
The full text of the judgment is published on the CURIA website on the day of delivery.

Press contact: Christopher Fretwell (+352) 4303 3355
Pictures of the delivery of the judgment are available from “Europe by Satellite” (+32) 2 2964106

[3] Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, signed in Montreal on 9 December 1999, approved on behalf of the European Community by Decision 2001/539/EC of 5 April 2001 (OJ 2001 L 194, p. 38). www.curia.europa.eu

Comments Off | ACTIVISM LINKS, Law

Conservative Pride & Prejudice

October 19th, 2012 — 8:16pm

A train-fare-dodging, disability car-space parking Finance Minister; one who spends a small fortune to avoid overcrowded trains all-together; a sexist Prime Minister; an abusive Chief Whip; a churlish Olympics Minister; and a intolerant Defence Minister.

If that weren’t enough, there is the later misrepresentation of their misdemeanors. Conservative exceptionalism and dishonesty is seldom laid so bare.

Sunday 06 January 2013
Simon Burns, minister responsible for train fares, uses £80,000-a-year chauffeur-driven government car to ‘avoid overcrowded trains’
News is likely to provoke more anger from commuters still reeling from the New Year inflation-busting rise in train fares last week.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/simon-burns-minister-responsible-for-train-fares-uses-80000ayear-chauffeurdriven-government-car-to-avoid-overcrowded-trains-8439959.html

Oct. 2012
Great train snobbery! Osborne [Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer] embarrassment after sitting in first class with standard-class ticket
George Osborne was tonight facing acute embarrassment after his aides were caught demanding he be allowed to sit in a first-class train carriage with a standard-class ticket.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/great-train-snobbery-osborne-embarrassment-after-sitting-in-first-class-with-standardclass-ticket-8218841.html

George Osborne raises standard in first-class train row
Treasury account of chancellor’s aide finding ticket inspector to pay for upgrade on Virgin train contradicts reporter’s version

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/oct/19/george-osborne-standard-ticket-first-class-train

FRIDAY 05 APRIL 2013
George Osborne caught parking in disabled bay
Chancellor criticised for being ‘wildly out of touch’ by disability campaigners

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/george-osborne-caught-parking-in-disabled-bay-8561043.html

Mar. 2011
Boris Johnson [Conservative Mayor of London] slams the fare-dodging ‘parasites’ who cost Londoners £75m

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/boris-johnson-slams-the-faredodging-parasites-who-cost-londoners-75m-6579012.html

Oct. 2012
Conservative Defence Minister, Andrew Robathan, attempts to eject “noisy” veterans from Parliament public galley after what witnesses describe as polite and barely audible applause for opposition speakers.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/9622019/Forces-minister-requested-noisy-fusiliers-be-ejected-from-Commons-gallery.html

Sept. 2012
Chief Whip Mitchell facing growing demands to resign after abusing Downing Street police
The Government Chief Whip was facing growing demands to resign tonight after it emerged he had directed a volley of abuse at policemen guarding Downing Street. Mr Mitchell was reported to have raged: “Best you learn your f****** place. You don’t run this f****** Government. You’re f****** plebs.” The newspaper also claimed he described the officers as “morons”.. [Doubts have emerged about the police's official version of events when a SO6 officer was arrested over allegations he had falsely claimed to be a member of the public who witnessed the event. Mitchell has always denied calling the officer a Pleb. He does not deny swearing, but claims the language was not directed at the officer. There is no elaboration on whether the officer should continue to know his place]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chief-whip-mitchell-facing-growing-demands-to-resign-after-abusing-downing-street-police-8162512.html

    2011
    Boris Johnson [Conservative Mayor of London]: people swearing at police should expect to be arrested

    http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-09-21/people-who-swear-at-police-should-be-arrested/

June 2012
‘Do you know who I am?’ That’s what the Olympics minister snorted at bemused security guards who wouldn’t let him into London 2012’s new media centre
Hugh Robertson tried to get into London 2012’s new media centre without the necessary pass. A security officer recalled how the MP had snapped at him: ‘He said, “I’m the Olympics minister. You should damn well know who I am”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2165772/London-2012-Olympics-minister-Hugh-Robertson-snorted-know-I-am.html#ixzz29m83oFUT

Apr. 2011
David Cameron sparks sexism row with “calm down dear” remarks
Blundering David Cameron sparked a sexism row yesterday by telling Labour’s Angela Eagle to “calm down, dear”.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-cameron-sparks-sexism-row-125231

Comments Off | ACTIVISM LINKS

Tax Avoidance Scandals

October 16th, 2012 — 10:04pm

HMRC are being ‘bamboozled’ by Google: MPs confront search giant over ‘devious’ attempt to avoid paying UK tax
Internet giants on back foot after shopping giant admitted it receives more in government grants than it pays in UK corporate tax
Google was branded “devious, calculating and unethical” by MPs who accused the internet giant of deliberately subverting its motto, “don’t be evil”, in order to pay less tax.
Infuriated members of the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) lashed out at the company as one of its most senior executives insisted it was not “selling” advertising in the UK – but in low-tax Ireland instead. The arrangement allowed Google to pay just £6m in UK corporation tax in 2011 despite generating more than £3bn in advertising revenues in this country. Google’s head of operations in Northern Europe, Matt Brittin, had been called back to give evidence to the PAC after it emerged that Google’s UK staff had effectively been selling advertising – despite claims by the company that all UK transactions took place in Ireland. MPs told Mr Brittin that they had been contacted by whistleblowers who used to work for the company who had described the extent of sales operations in the UK. This included pay slips showing UK-based staff being paid substantial bonuses depending on their “sales” and evidence that big clients were being dealt with almost exclusively in the UK.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/hmrc-are-being-bamboozled-by-google-mps-confront-search-giant-over-devious-attempt-to-avoid-paying-uk-tax-8618695.html

8:17pm UK, Wednesday 15 May 2013
Amazon Paid £2.4m Tax on £4.2bn Sales In 2012
Accounting through a Luxembourg sales unit allows the retail giant to pay less in UK taxes than it received in government grants. Amazon.com’s main UK unit paid £2.4m in taxes in 2012 on sales of £4.3bn, newly-published accounts have revealed. The accounts also showed the company received £2.5m in government grants over the course of the year.

http://news.sky.com/story/1091370/amazon-paid-2-4m-tax-on-4-2bn-sales-in-2012

It is believed the company was able to report the relatively small corporate income tax bill because its sales to British customers are routed through a Luxembourg affiliate, Amazon EU Sarl.
MONDAY 22 APRIL 2013
You should be glad we pay so little tax, says Google boss Eric Schmidt – but MPs call to have his role as government adviser revoked
Executive chairman insists the company is key to UK economic growth as its adverts empower ‘literally billions of pounds of start-ups’
He insisted that Google would comply only with the letter of the law – despite paying only £6m of taxes on £2.6bn of revenue generated in the UK in 2011. Google uses anomalies in international law to move profits into low-tax jurisdictions even if they have been generated by business carried out in Britain.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/you-should-be-glad-we-pay-so-little-tax-says-google-boss-eric-schmidt–but-mps-call-to-have-his-role-as-government-adviser-revoked-8582605.html

TUESDAY 16 APRIL 2013
Npower admits it has paid no corporation tax in UK for three years
Energy boss tells MPs that avoidance is because of ’simple UK accounting rule’
“In the past three years RWE Npower has reported profits totalling £766m – yet today they admitted they have not paid a single penny of corporation tax over that period.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/npower-admits-it-has-paid-no-corporation-tax-in-uk-for-three-years-8575099.html

Thursday 31 January 2013
Jackpot! Bookies avoid £1bn tax
Big gambling firms are using tax havens – and Treasury still hasn’t closed loophole

http://www.independent.co.uk/money/tax/jackpot-bookies-avoid-1bn-tax-8476143.html

Sunday 23 December 2012
Facebook paid £2.9m tax on £840m profits made outside US, figures show
Company channelled bulk of profits through Ireland and on to Cayman Islands, allowing to it pay just £238,000 to UK taxman

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/dec/23/facebook-tax-profits-outside-us

Dec 10, 2012
Google Revenues Sheltered in No-Tax Bermuda Soar to $10 Billion
The U.K., Google’s second-biggest market, was responsible for about 11 percent of its sales, or almost $4.1 billion last year, according to company filings. Google paid 6 million pounds ($9.6 million) in U.K. income taxes.

Transfer Pricing

Multinational companies cut their tax bills using “transfer pricing,” paper transactions among corporate subsidiaries that allow for allocating income to tax havens and expenses to higher-tax countries.

In Google’s case, an Irish subsidiary collects revenues from ads sold in countries like the U.K. and France. That Irish unit in turn pays royalties to another Irish subsidiary, whose legal residence for tax purposes is in Bermuda.

The pair of Irish units gives rise to the nickname “Double Irish.” To avoid an Irish withholding tax, Google channeled the payments to Bermuda through a subsidiary in the Netherlands — thus the “Dutch Sandwich” label. The Netherlands subsidiary has no employees.

The Dutch unit’s payments to the Bermuda entity last year were up 81 percent to $9.8 billion from $5.4 billion in 2008. Google’s overseas sales have increased at about the same rate.

Google’s overall effective tax rate dropped to 21 percent last year from about 28 percent in 2008. That compares with the average combined U.S. and state statutory rate of about 39 percent.

COMMENT: FurtherBeyond

If the UK was as serious about tackling tax avoidance as it pretends, it would take steps to eliminate low tax regimes in its colonies. It’s about time the UK got rid of the last vestiges of its anachronistic Empire and joined the civilised world.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-10/google-revenues-sheltered-in-no-tax-bermuda-soar-to-10-billion.html

Sunday 02 December 2012
IoS investigation: Football’s tax shame
Britain’s Premier League football clubs are awash with money. They pay star players £250,000 a week, and turn over £2.2bn a year. Yet records show they paid only £3m in corporation tax last year

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/ios-investigation-footballs-tax-shame-8373895.html

Tuesday 27 November 2012
Amazon claimed sales in the UK of £207m last year. How much did amazon.co.uk actually take? £2.9bn
Online retailer forced to reveal full extent of its tax avoidance policies by Public Accounts Committee

http://www.independent.co.uk/money/tax/amazon-claimed-sales-in-the-uk-of-207m-last-year-how-much-did-amazoncouk-actually-take-29bn-8360518.html

Thursday 22 November 2012
Britain’s missing billions: counting the true cost of corporate tax avoidance
There’s a painful subtext to yesterday’s public finance figures. While most of us are paying more tax, many big companies are paying less
Yesterday’s public finance figures were a tale of two countries: the public paid more and corporations paid less. Last month Treasury receipts from VAT and income tax – which we all pay – rose by 6.4 per cent relative to October 2011. But corporation tax receipts – levied on the profits of the largest firms in the land – fell by 10 per cent on the same month a year earlier. In October companies poured £7.8bn into the state’s coffers, down from the £8.7bn they handed over last year. And this shortfall was not just a monthly aberration. Since George Osborne delivered his Budget in March companies have paid £24.9bn in corporation tax, 9.8 per cent less than the £27.6bn they handed over in the same period of last year.

http://www.independent.co.uk/money/tax/britains-missing-billions-counting-the-true-cost-of-corporate-tax-avoidance-8341096.html

Thursday 15 November 2012
They will out-invest and ultimately out-trade us,” tax-paying John Lewis protests, unable to compete fairly with tax-shirkers.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/15/britain-tax-havens-close-to-home-amazon

Sunday 18 November 2012
Vince Cable calls for tax crackdown
Tax authorities need to get tough to rein in systematic abuse of company taxation by multinationals, says business secretary
… Companies can use internal accounting strategies to cut their domestic tax liability… “you would need some pretty intensive investigation by [HM Revenue & Customs] to establish what exactly is going on, whether their transfer prices and their royalties are being fiddled or not.” “Our own tax authorities have got to be very tough on things like royalty payments, which is where a lot of the subterfuge takes place.”

How can Viagra maker Pfizer pay no UK tax?
Pfizer, the company behind the best-selling drug on the UK market, Lipitor, and impotence drug Viagra, had a turnover of £1.8bn on its sales in the UK last year. But despite its huge business in this country, the accounts of the company’s British-based subsidiary suggest it made an operating loss of £59m in 2011 and £46m in 2010. Critics say Pfizer’s operating loss is this country is typical of the way in which large multi-national companies are systematically able to legally avoid paying tax by piling costs into high tax jurisdictions, while reporting profits in low tax havens.

Apple paid less than 2% tax on overseas profits last year
US-based consumer electronics giant paid just $713m in overseas corporation tax on profits of $36.87bn

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/nov/04/apple-paid-low-overseas-tax

Top Bank of England director admits Occupy movement had a point
Andrew Haldane praises ‘loud and persuasive’ protesters who succeeded because ‘they are right’

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/top-bank-of-england-director-admits-occupy-movement-had-a-point-8231521.html

Starbucks ‘paid no UK tax since 2009′
US coffee chain has only paid $14m in corporation tax in UK since 1998, and nothing in past three years, probe finds.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2012/10/2012101615283844679.html

Starbucks avoiding tax has a knock-on effect on homegrown business
The UK’s tax policy should be rebalanced so multinationals can’t get away tax-free while small businesses struggle

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/16/starbucks-tax-british-business

Amazon: £7bn sales, no UK corporation tax
The SEC filings, highlighted by Bookseller magazine, show that in the past three years, Amazon has generated sales of more than £7.6bn in the UK without attracting any corporation tax on the profits from those sales.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/apr/04/amazon-british-operation-corporation-tax

Vodafone faces tax payment row
Telecoms company paid zero corporation tax in the UK this year, despite handing more than £2.3bn to other countries

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jun/26/vodafone-faces-tax-payment-row

Google to face MPs over tax avoidance scheme
Google faces a potential grilling by MPs over its tax affairs after it emerged it paid only £6m to the Exchequer on UK revenues of £395m.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/9471744/Google-to-face-MPs-over-tax-avoidance-scheme.html

Facebook’s UK tax bill was less than it pays its average worker: Company paid just £238,000 to the taxman in 2011 despite UK revenue being £175million

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2215755/Facebook-paid-just-238-000-corporation-tax-Britain-year-diverted-sales-Ireland.html

HSBC corporation tax bill makes a mockery of UK tax system
Commenting on HSBC’s 2010 financial results published today (Monday), which show the bank paid just £236 million ($383 million) in UK corporation tax despite Europe-wide profits of nearly £2.65 billion ($4.3 billion) – much of which would have been generated in the UK

http://www.tuc.org.uk/economy/tuc-19222-f0.cfm

Barclays bank forced to admit it paid just £113m in corporation tax in 2009
Barclays Bank has been forced to admit it paid just £113m in UK corporation tax in 2009 – a year when it rang up a record £11.6bn of profits.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/18/barclays-bank-113m-corporation-tax

http://secretcity-thefilm.com/

Time to abolish the UK’s last “rotten borough” – the City of London Corporation
One year on from the Occupy protest at St Paul’s, we’re no closer to reforming the dark heart of predatory capitalism.

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/time-abolish-uks-last-rotten-borough-city-london-corporation

Transfer pricing may appear mundane but the fact is that the wellbeing of hundreds of millions of people is at stake

http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/10/15/transfer-pricing-may-appear-mundane-but-the-fact-is-that-the-wellbeing-of-hundreds-of-millions-of-people-is-at-stake/

.

Comments Off | ACTIVISM LINKS

Big Pharma: Profits before patients

October 13th, 2012 — 10:20am

SUNDAY 28 APRIL 2013
The real cancer killer: rip-off prices for drugs
Doctors say industry ‘profiteering’ threatens lives
The group of more than 100 leading cancer physicians from around the world, including nine from the UK, accuse the drug industry of “profiteering” – making a profit by unethical methods such as by raising the cost of grain after a natural disaster.

One of the best known – imatinib, whose brand name is Glivec – has proved so successful in chronic myeloid leukaemia that patients who a decade ago survived for a few years can now look forward to a near-normal life expectancy.

But the cost of Glivec has risen from £18,000 per patient per year to around £21,000 in the UK, and from $30,000 to $92,000 in the US. This is despite the fact that all research costs were covered by the original price, and the number of patients treated and the length of time they are on the drug have both vastly increased because of the drug’s success.

Of the 12 drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the US in 2012, 11 were priced above $100,000 (£65,000) per patient per year. In addition the price of existing drugs of proven effectiveness has been increased by up to threefold

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/the-real-cancer-killer-ripoff-prices-for-drugs-8591825.html

FRIDAY 19 APRIL 2013
GlaxoSmithKline accused of deal to delay release of generic versions of anti-depressant drug
OFT says move denied the NHS ’significant’ cost savings.
The Office of Fair Trading today accused drugs giant GlaxoSmithKline of abusing its dominant market position over sales of one of its best-selling medicines.

The watchdog alleges that GSK made “substantial payments” to three other companies that were planning to produce generic versions of the anti-depressant drug paroxetine, which GSK sold under the brand Seroxat in the UK. The companies then delayed generic launches, it claimed.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/glaxosmithkline-accused-of-deal-to-delay-release-of-generic-versions-of-antidepressant-drug-8579864.html

MONDAY 01 APRIL 2013
Celebration for patients after India’s landmark ruling against drug giant Novartis means millions can afford generic medicines
The dispute involving Novartis, a Swiss-based multi-national pharmaceutical company, dated back seven years and centred on its attempt to seek a patent for its anti-cancer drug Glivec. Celebrated as a breakthrough in treating forms of blood cancer, Glivec costs £1,700 a month in its branded form while the generic version is available in India from £115. The company claimed the drug was a new product while activists said it was merely a slightly modified version of an earlier product whose patent had expired. Activists said today’s ruling means other drug companies will also be prevented from obtaining patents on updated version of existing drugs, a practice known as “ever-greening”. They said the impact will be felt around the world. Pratibha Singh, a lawyer for generic drug producer Cipla, part of an industry that is expected to be worth £46bn by 2010, told Agence France-Presse that the “ruling will have implications not just for India but also for other Asian, African and Latin American countries”. She added: “The ruling also makes it clear you cannot patent a drug by just making some minor modifications – the key Section 3d of the patent law has been upheld by the court.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/celebration-for-patients-after-indias-landmark-ruling-against-drug-giant-novartis-means-millions-can-afford-generic-medicines-8556109.html

Tuesday 29 January 2013
Families face battle with GSK over dangerous diabetes drug
Exclusive: Pharmaceutical giant resists claims despite settlement with victims in US
The manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, has admitted concealing data about the damaging side-effects of the drug, and there is evidence of the drug’s harmful effects. But, despite this, GSK is not prepared to settle claims in the UK without a court fight.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jan/29/glaxosmithkline-legal-fight-uk-diabetes

Drugs giant Roche accused of sitting on trial data for flu treatment
Doubts remain about efficacy and safety of Tamiflu, stockpiled for use in pandemics
In 2009, researchers from the Cochrane Collaboration found that results of eight out of 10 key trials of Tamiflu were never fully published and concluded there was “insufficient data” to show it reduced complications – a vital factor in a pandemic which could save lives.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/drugs-giant-roche-accused-of-sitting-on-trial-data-for-flu-treatment-8262319.html

Drug firms are ‘risking lives by hiding bad trials and side effects of their medicines’
Critics of the system estimate that around half of all clinical trials are never published in academic journals – and that trials with positive results are twice as likely to be published. Yesterday Dr Wollaston [Tory Backbencher] told MPs: ‘Missing data from clinical trials distorts the evidence and prevents patients and their doctors from making informed decisions about treatment.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2222220/Drug-firms-risking-lives-hiding-bad-trials-effects-medicines.html#ixzz2AavePK16

MS drug ‘rebranded’ – at up to 20 times the price
Pharmaceutical giant withdraws existing treatment to boost profits
Genzyme, part of the multinational drug company Sanofi, halts supplies of the drug alemtuzumab for multiple sclerosis.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/exclusive-ms-drug-rebranded–at-up-to-20-times-the-price-8209885.html

Drug giants give up on Alzheimer’s cure
Research too difficult and costly, say pharmaceutical companies

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/drug-giants-give-up-on-alzheimers-cure-8153606.html

Rosiglitazone, a new type of diabetes drug was lauded for reducing blood sugar levels in people with diabetes and so for reducing heart attacks. However independent research showed a 43% increase in the risk of heart problems

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/oct/17/bad-pharma-ben-goldacre-review

US Justice department took GSK to court for illegal marketing and failing to report drug safety data.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/oct/17/bad-pharma-ben-goldacre-review

GlaxoSmithKline fraud case: Does crime pay?
As the pharmaceutical giant is fined a record sum of $3bn, we ask if the move will be a deterrent for others. In the biggest health care fraud settlement in US history, a federal judge approved a fine totalling $3bn for criminal and civil violations by the British pharmaceutical giant, GlaxoSmithKline, last week. “Most of the examples … are of a drug that is approved for disease A and it is thought to be safe and effective for disease A but they’re not selling enough. It’s still on patent … as long as it’s on patent, as long as they can charge more, they will start pushing it for disease B and C and D for which there is no evidence that the benefits outweigh the risks so this is a strategy widely used by companies to increase their sales.” – Dr Sidney Wolfe, co-founder and director of the Health Research Group
The company admitted illegally marketing the popular antidepressants Paxil and Wellbutrin and also withholding the data on the health risks of its best-selling diabetes drug, Avandia. For seven years Glaxo failed to report data showing drug Avandia increased the risk of heart attack by as much as 40 per cent. And the company claimed Wellbutrin was beneficial for weightloss and treating sexual dysfunction.

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestoryamericas/2012/07/201271084038662313.html

Thalidomide

Vioxx

Drugs companies putting profit ahead of medical discoveries, warn scientists
Researchers say companies spend vastly more on marketing than on new treatments

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/drugs-companies-putting-profit-ahead-of-medical-discoveries-warn-scientists-8015784.html

Bad Drugs

Genetic profiteering: scandal of firm ‘hiding vital breast cancer data’
Company ‘decided to withhold its trade secrets’

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/genetic-profiteering-scandal-of-firm-hiding-vital-breast-cancer-data-8270020.html

Comments Off | ACTIVISM LINKS

LINKS – Iraq War Illegal

October 2nd, 2012 — 5:11pm

Tony Blair and Iraq: The damning evidence
Secret testimony to Chilcot Inquiry by British intelligence shows former PM ‘accepted Libya was a bigger threat’

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tony-blair-and-iraq-the-damning-evidence-8563133.html

Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq

Kofi Annan: Tony Blair could ultimately have stopped Iraq war
Former UN secretary general says in memoirs he admired ex-British PM until he failed to stand up to US over invasion.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/29/kofi-annan-tony-blair-iraq

Lord Goldsmith warned ministers that Iraq war would be illegal

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/7025672/Lord-Goldsmith-warned-ministers-that-Iraq-war-would-be-illegal.html

Blair blocked Cabinet from hearing legal advice on Iraq
MPs demand recall of Chilcot inquiry to question former PM over revelation in Campbell diaries the Attorney General Lord Goldsmith wanted to “put the reality” to cabinet ministers that there was a case against, as well as for, military action in March 2003. But, according to his former spin doctor, the then Prime Minister feared that the legal opinion was too “nuanced” and would allow the war’s ministerial critics Robin Cook [died hiking] and Clare Short to say that the case had not been made.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-blocked-cabinet-from-hearing-legal-advice-on-iraq-7878737.html

Cabinet should have been told of attorney general’s doubts, Iraq inquiry hears
Civil service head Gus O’Donnell suggests Tony Blair breached ministerial code by not providing full text of legal advice
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jan/28/cabinet-attorney-general-iraq-doubts

BBC report on ’sexed up’ dossier is vindicated, says Dyke
Greg Dyke and Andrew Gilligan seized on the findings of the Butler inquiry last night, insisting it vindicated the BBC’s report that the controversial dossier on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) had been embellished.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/bbc-report-on-sexed-up-dossier-is-vindicated-says-dyke-6165565.html

Hans Blix | Former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and then chief United Nations weapons inspector
publicly contradicted claims from the administration of former US president George W Bush that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD). It was an assessment the US pushed aside. Blix also accused the British government of dramatising the threat of weapons in Iraq in order to strengthen its case for joining the 2003 war against Saddam Hussein. No stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction were ever found.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/03/2012323161458267958.html

ElBaradei disputed the U.S. rationale for the 2003 invasion of Iraq
from the time of the 2002 Iraq disarmament crisis, when he, along with Hans Blix, led a team of UN weapons inspectors in Iraq. ElBaradei told the UN Security Council in March 2003 that documents purporting to show that Iraq had tried to acquire uranium from Niger were not authentic.

He [ElBaradei] had “been validated” in concluding that Saddam Hussein had not revived his nuclear weapons program.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17060-2004Nov1.html

Chief weapons inspector Hans Blix said in January 2003 that “access has been provided to all sites we have wanted to inspect” and Iraq had “cooperated rather well” in that regard.
http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/Bx27.htm

Secret memos expose link between oil firms and invasion of Iraq
Plans to exploit Iraq’s oil reserves were discussed by government ministers and the world’s largest oil companies the year before Britain took a leading role in invading Iraq, government documents show. Five months before the March 2003 invasion, Baroness Symons, then the Trade Minister, told BP that the Government believed British energy firms should be given a share of Iraq’s enormous oil and gas reserves as a reward for Tony Blair’s military commitment to US plans for regime change. Whereas BP was insisting in public that it had “no strategic interest” in Iraq, in private it told the Foreign Office that Iraq was “more important than anything we’ve seen for a long time”.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/secret-memos-expose-link-between-oil-firms-and-invasion-of-iraq-2269610.html

“Curveball”, the Iraqi defector who fabricated claims about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction,
smiled as he confirmed how he made the whole thing up. It was a confidence trick that changed the course of history, with Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi’s lies used to justify the Iraq war. He tried to defend his actions: “My main purpose was to topple the tyrant in Iraq because the longer this dictator remains in power, the more the Iraqi people will suffer from this regime’s oppression.”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10796047

Mohamed ElBaradei Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ,
ElBaradei has called for international criminal investigation of former Bush regime officials for their roles in fomenting the war on Iraq.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/international/former-iaea-head-suggests-iraq-war-crime-probe-of-bush-administration-1.357684?localLinksEnabled=false

Tutu urges trial for Blair and Bush over Iraq
Nobel Peace Laureate says former leaders of UK and US left world more destabilised as result of their roles in 2003 war. Tutu argued that different standards appeared to apply for prosecuting African leaders than western counterparts, and added that the death toll during and after the Iraq conflict was sufficient for Blair and Bush to face trial.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2012/09/2012929208921981.html

The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (KLWCC), also known as the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, is a Malaysian organisation established in 2007 by Mahathir Mohamad to investigate war crimes
In November 2011 the tribunal purportedly exercised universal jurisdiction to try in absentia former US President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, convicting both for crimes against peace because of what the tribunal concluded was the unlawful invasion of Iraq.[7][8][9] In May 2012 after hearing testimony for a week from victims of torture at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, the tribunal unanimously convicted in absentia former President Bush, former Vice President Dick Cheney, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, former Deputy Assistant Attorneys General John Yoo and Jay Bybee, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and former counselors David Addington and William Haynes II of conspiracy to commit war crimes, specifically torture.[10] The tribunal referred their findings to the chief prosecutor at the International Court of Justice in the Hague.[11]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuala_Lumpur_War_Crimes_Commission

Comments Off | ACTIVISM LINKS, Law

LINKS – Capatalism Myths

September 20th, 2012 — 8:39am

Demystified: 11 myths Capitalism feeds on

As anti-Capitalism protests sweep across societies in the Western world, a Portuguese economist has catalogued a list of propagated myths that the Capitalist order survives on. “Capitalism in the neoliberal version has exhausted itself. Financial sharks do not want to lose profits, and shift the main burden of debt to the retirees and the poor,” Guilherme Alves Coelho wrote in an article appearing on the Global Research website. He added that, to manipulate public opinion, there are many ways, on which the ideology of capitalism has been grounded. “These myths are distributed and promoted via media tools, educational institutions, family traditions, church memberships, etc.” They were designed “to represent capitalism as credible and enlist the support and confidence of the masses,” Coelho said, proceeding to enumerate the most common myths surrounding Capitalism.

Myth 1: Under capitalism, anyone who works hard can become rich.

According to this myth, the capitalist system will automatically provide wealth to hard-working individuals. Thus, workers unconsciously form an “illusory hope,” and if their efforts do not come to fruition, they will only have themselves to blame.
However, Coelho argues that “under capitalism, the probability of success, regardless [of] how much you may have worked, is the same as in a lottery.” Wealth, with rare exceptions, he adds, is not gained through hard work, but is a result of “fraud and lack of remorse” and is reserved for those who enjoy “greater influence and power.” “This myth creates the followers of the system who support it.”

Myth 2: Capitalism creates wealth and prosperity for all.

This myth states that wealth, accumulated in the hands of a minority, sooner or later will be redistributed among all.
“The goal is to enable the employer to accumulate wealth without asking questions. At the same time the hope is maintained that sooner or later workers will be rewarded for their work and dedication.” Coelho, however, argues that the ultimate goal of capitalism is not the distribution of wealth but its “accumulation and concentration” and cites the “widening gap between the rich and the poor in recent decades especially after the establishment of the rule of neo-liberalism” as evidence.

Myth 3: We are all in the same boat.

Otherwise stated, Capitalist society has no classes, therefore the responsibility for the failures and crises also lies on all and everyone has to pay. “The goal is to create a guilt complex for workers, allowing capitalists to increase revenues and pass expenditures onto the people.” Coelho begs to differ, saying the responsibility in fact lies “entirely on the elite consisting of billionaires who support the government and are supported by it, and have always enjoyed great privileges in taxation, tenders, financial speculation, offshore, nepotism, etc.” “This myth is implanted by the elites to avoid responsibility for the plight of the people and oblige them to pay for the elite’s mistakes.”

Myth 4: Capitalism means freedom.

The myth alleges that true freedom is only achieved under capitalism with the help of the so-called “market self-regulation.” “The goal is to create something similar to a religion of capitalism, where everything is taken as is, and deny people the right to participate in making macroeconomic decisions.” Coelho states that in a Capitalist society, decision-making freedom, the ultimate form of freedom, is “only enjoyed by a narrow circle of powerful individuals, not the people, and not even the government agencies.” “This myth has been used to justify interference in the internal affairs of non-capitalist countries, based on the assumption that they have no freedom, but have rules.”

Myth 5: Capitalism means democracy.

According to this myth, democracy can only exist under capitalism and all other models of social order are dictatorship.
“This myth, which smoothly follows from the previous one, was created in order to prevent the discussion of other models of social order.” This is while, a Capitalist society, according to Coelho, is divided into classes and the rich, being ultra-minority, dominate over all others. This capitalist “democracy” is nothing but a disguised dictatorship, he says, adding, “As the previous myth, this one also serves as an excuse to criticize and attack non-capitalist countries.”

Myth 6: Election is a synonym of democracy.

“The goal is to denigrate or demonize other systems and prevent a discussion of political and electoral systems where leaders are determined through non-bourgeois elections, for example, on the virtue of age, experience, or popularity of candidates.” In fact, Coelho says, it is the capitalist system that constantly “manipulates and bribes, [and] where a vote is a conditional term and election is only a formal act.”

Myth 7: Alternating parties in office is the same as having an alternative.

Bourgeois parties that periodically alternate in power have alternative platforms, this myth tends to suggest. “The goal is to perpetuate the capitalist system within the dominant class, feeding the myth that democracy is reduced to the election.” Coelho says the two-party or multiparty parliamentary system is in fact a one-party system, and these are two or more factions “of one political force”, where they alternate, “mimicking the party with an alternative policy.” “People always choose an agent of the system, being sure that this is not what they are doing.” “The myth that bourgeois parties have different platforms and are even oppositional, is one of the most important, it is constantly discussed to make the capitalist system work,” Coelho adds.

Myth 8: The elected politician represents the people and can therefore decide for them.

“The purpose of this myth is to feed the people with empty promises and hide the real measures that will be implemented in practice.” In fact, Coelho says, leaders elected in a Capitalist society do not fulfill their promises, or, worse, start to implement undeclared measures, often contradicting the original Constitution. “The systematic practice of falsification of democracy under capitalism is one of the reasons for the increasing number of people who do not go to the elections.”

Myth 9: There is no alternative to Capitalism.

Capitalism is not perfect, but it is the only possible economic and political system, and therefore the most appropriate one, so the myth goes. “The goal is to eliminate the study and promotion of other systems and eliminate competition using all possible means, including force.” “This myth is intended to intimidate people, to prevent the discussion of alternatives to capitalism and ensure unanimity,” Coelho adds.

Myth 10: Savings generate wealth.

The economic crisis is caused by the excess of employee benefits. If they are removed, the myth promises, the government will save and the country will become rich. “The goal is to shift the liability for capitalist debt payment onto the public sector, including the retirees.” Another goal, Coelho says, is to make people accept poverty, arguing that it is temporary. It is also intended to facilitate the privatization of the public sector.

Myth 11: The current crisis of Capitalism is short-term and will be resolved for the benefit of the people.

According to this myth, the current financial crisis is a normal cyclical crisis of Capitalism, not a systemic plight and will not lead to its collapse. The goal, Coelho argues, is to continue to plunder the resources of the Capitalist country and exploit people. It is also a means of staying in power. However, he says, what is happening today is “a systemic crisis of the capitalist system, i.e. the growth of the contradictions between social production and the private character of appropriation of profit, and is insoluble.”

http://presstv.com/detail/234725.html

Noam Chomsky: Can Civilization Survive Capitalism?
Capitalism as it exists today is radically incompatible with democracy.
The term “capitalism” is commonly used to refer to the U.S. economic system, with substantial state intervention ranging from subsidies for creative innovation to the “too-big-to-fail” government insurance policy for banks.
The system is highly monopolized, further limiting reliance on the market, and increasingly so: In the past 20 years the share of profits of the 200 largest enterprises has risen sharply, reports scholar Robert W. McChesney in his new book “Digital Disconnect.”

“Capitalism” is a term now commonly used to describe systems in which there are no capitalists

Dewey called for workers to be “masters of their own industrial fate” and for all institutions to be brought under public control, including the means of production, exchange, publicity, transportation and communication. Short of this, Dewey argued, politics will remain “the shadow cast on society by big business.” [John Dewey, America’s leading social philosopher, in the late 19th century and early 20th century.]

control of government is narrowly concentrated at the peak of the income scale, while the large majority “down below” has been virtually disenfranchised. The current political-economic system is a form of plutocracy, diverging sharply from democracy

Comments Off | ACTIVISM LINKS

Curious Kew

May 20th, 2012 — 5:53pm

Kew is a charming and odd place.

I’ve seen pooches in pushchairs and cats on leashes.

Kew Pooch

Christian names are surnames (Jackson) or foods (Poppy).

Punters pre-order pheasant from the village butcher.

The homeless complete crosswords whilst they wait for spare change.

Nearby, cork-boards in branded coffee-shops advertise pet-portraits or baby-yoga.

It’s like an alternate reality.

Comments Off | 01... United Kingdom, 06 LONDON LIFE

Back to top